Recently in Blogging Category

Revisiting 2011

| No Comments

When I started looking at the year's most-read posts a couple of years ago, I noticed that the list always includes a lot of older posts. So, I started a new post last year: a list of the past year's posts that didn't make the 2011 Top 10, but that I think are worth another look.

Previous years' lists
2010: Top 10 posts, Thinking through 2010
2009: Top 10 posts

Top Posts of 2011

| No Comments

I don't really do predictions—at least, not publicly. I do, however, find it interesting to look back and see which posts have drawn the most attention in the past year. As in previous years' lists (2010, 2009), some of the most-read posts are old ones—going all the way back to 2006 (!).

Remember these?

  1. New Dashboards Blend Analytics Sources - September 2010 (#9 in 2010)

  2. Monitoring Social Media Before You Have a Budget - May 2008 (#1 in 2009 & 2010)

  3. What Does Salesforce-Radian6 Deal Mean for Everyone Else? - March 2011

  4. Global Social Media Usage Patterns - January 2011

  5. Human vs. machine analysis - April 2007 (#4 in 2010)

  6. Visual text analysis - April 2007 (#2 in 2010)

  7. The Specialization of Social Media Analysis - March 2011

  8. Professional-Strength Social Media Aggregators - June 2010 (#8 in 2010)

  9. Text Analytics in the Cloud - February 2011

  10. Defining social media relations - November 2006
With only four of the top ten from 2011, this view always misses what I think of as the more interesting posts, which is why I choose my own list for revisiting 2011. All of which sets the stage for what's breaking out of the drafts folder next.

Happy New Year.

Blogger's Block Should be a Meme

| 2 Comments

Roadblock rockFred Wilson posted a simple request yesterday and got an amazing response. He wrote that he was experiencing Blogger's Block, and he asked his readers to suggest topics. The response? Over 360 comments (so far), suggesting and discussing more topics than Fred will be able to write about in a year. Obviously, people—a lot of them—are interested in Fred's opinions. I think this is great, and every blog ought to do it.

As I see it, asking the question invites two main risks: you might get no response, or people might suggest topics you don't want to write about. As for the former, I've invited responses that never came. While it's not fun, it doesn't leave a scar. No response means that the post didn't land with your readers, so they're unlikely to remember any of it.

If your audience is interested in something you don't want to write about, that probably tells you something you need to know.

Why are we here?
I sometimes wonder what people really want or expect from this blog. It accomplished its original goal a long time ago, and now it's a blend of what I'm finding around social media analysis and other topics I find interesting. The list posts tend to draw a lot of traffic, while the thought posts (where I think the real value should be) mostly don't.

Increasingly, I'm working on new topics that might surprise you if you think I'm interested primarily in marketing. I haven't yet worked out how much of that I should include.

Now for the scary part
I think every blogger could benefit from hearing what readers want more of. So, what do you want to see from this blog? Don't leave me listening to crickets.

And if you have your own blog? Tag, you're it.

Photo by WSDOT.

Thinking Through 2010

| No Comments

I don't try to post every day. That might be good for building audience numbers, but I'm much more interested in working out new ideas, and so I post when I have something to say. At year-end, it's curious and a little upsetting that so many of the year's most-viewed posts are from the past. So here's a quick list of posts from 2010 that I'd like to see people discover.

And then there's the draft folder, which tells me there's plenty left to do in the new year.

What You Liked in 2010

| No Comments

Another year gone, another post or two in the archive. And now it's time to see which posts got the most attention this year.

  1. Monitoring Social Media Before You Have a Budget - May 2008 (#1 in 2009)

  2. Visual text analysis - April 2007 (#4 in 2009)

  3. Sentiment Analysis is Not a Mood Ring - March 2010

  4. Human vs. machine analysis - April 2007 (#7 in 2009)

  5. Corporate social media specialists - September 2007 (#5 in 2009)

  6. 5 Manly Things - February 2009

  7. Comparing Social Media Analysis Platforms - March 2010

  8. Professional-Strength Social Media Aggregators - June 2010

  9. New Dashboards Blend Analytics Sources - September 2010

  10. Guide to Social Media Analysis - June 2007 (#9 in 2009)
It's interesting to see the year-to-year changes in the list. Four current-year posts appear this year, up from only two last year. Still, half the list is not only old posts, but old posts from the 2009 list. Clearly, a list of free stuff is popular, but some of these are surprising—I guess there's no correlation between the effort required to write a post and its enduring popularity.

Some of the biggest ideas are stuck in draft—or hidden in business plans—but there's another list of my favorite idea posts of 2010.

Ugh. Yahoo is killing off Delicious, the social bookmarking service that I've used since 2005. This is inconvenient. I don't need to spend my time rebuilding stuff that already works.

First priority is saving all the bookmarks. Frank Gruber posted a list of backup options to cover the basics. At least I don't have to worry about losing the bookmarks entirely. The challenge here is to replace what Delicious does in my publishing workflow. Just saving links doesn't meet the requirement.

I don't have the answer for that, yet. So far, I'm collecting names of services that might work. Here's what I've seen mentioned:

Any other suggestions? I use Delicious to support dynamic content on multiple websites. Replacing it kind of matters to me.

I don't suppose anyone thought of offering Delicious Pro accounts. I do pay for some of the other services I'm using. Would revenue make a difference to Yahoo?

Update 12/17: Now Yahoo says they're selling Delicious, not shutting it down. That would be better.

Note to self: Figure out which other Yahoo properties I use. Migrate. Don't look back.

Is Blogging Courtesy Over?

| 1 Comment

What happened to giving credit in blog posts? I was just working on another post, and as I inserted a link, it struck me that I'm not seeing "via" and "hat tip" links as much as I used to. It's a nice way to give credit to the sources who point you to useful links, and it's useful for readers, too. Has giving credit to blog sources gone out of style?

Courtesy is the best kind of self-promotion, in that is costs nothing and wins you everything.
Jim Durbin

Maybe I'm not seeing them because I skim so much more than I read lately. But maybe it's not just me…

@gilliatt - think the time for crediting seems to have passed…I always credit where possible, keeps everyone sharing as per today in IMHO
Gray Dudek

Crediting sources in blog posts is a good practice. I'll keep linking to my sources; I hope you will, too.

Only a few hours left in the year, and I haven't fulfilled the apparent obligation of bloggers to post some sort of year-end list. Best of, worst of, predictions... you've seen 'em all by now. I have my predictions, most of which are embedded in my business plan, but the prediction that is most on my mind is this: 2010 is looking big from here. So, before the ball drops and the fireworks go up, here's a look back at the most-viewed posts in 2009:

  1. Monitoring Social Media Before You Have a Budget - May 2008

  2. The Sentiment on Sentiment Analysis - September 2009

  3. Defining social media relations - November 2006

  4. Visual text analysis - April 2007

  5. Corporate social media specialists - September 2007

  6. Sorting out social media measurement - July 2007

  7. Human vs. machine analysis - April 2007

  8. Social Media Analysis for Workgroups - August 2008

  9. Guide to Social Media Analysis - June 2007

  10. Companies Downplay Online Reputation Risk - March 2009
It's striking how many of these are old posts—only two of these are from this year. I suppose I should look through the archives to see what else is hiding there! To be fair, though, the most-visited page is the front page, which always has the most recent posts, and RSS subscribers have about doubled since last New Year's Eve. So somebody's seeing the new stuff. :-)

I'll keep focusing on quality over quantity, but I'm not about to stop writing here. Any topics you want to get into?

While the archive looks back, I'm definitely looking forward. '10 looks big from here. I hope it's big for you, too.

No More Tag Posts

| No Comments

I turned off the automatic tag posts from Delicious today. Murphy being on the job, the post linking to the recent New York Times article on sentiment analysis promptly got a comment when I did that—a good one, too. But the tag posts are gone. The list of recent posts was overrun with "links for [date]" entries, and I lost some email subscribers who were probably tired of them, too. So they're gone.

I'll continue to use Delicious; it's part of my publishing workflow, as well as my bookmarking service of preference. I'll also continue the practice of adding editorial content in the comments to my tags. Depending on the tag, these items will continue to appear on my web sites. If you want to see all of them, they're also available as an RSS feed.

I have some good stuff in the drafts folder. I really don't want it to be lost is a sea of links posts.

I don't know if this is one of the recognized corollaries of Murphy's Law, but I've long known that you can't game the system. If you count on Murphy to make something work out in the end, it won't.

I'm not even going to ask if it's happened to you. If you have a blog, it has. You work on a big idea and a great blog post, and while it's stuck in the drafts folder, someone else posts on the same topic. Man, I hate when that happens. It makes it look like the other guy thought of it first and I'm just echoing. So let's do something about it.

Would it help to have a little extra motivation? A challenge, perhaps? Here's the plan:

  1. Pick the two best topics spending too much time in your draft folder and give us the quick version in a new post.

  2. Tweet your post and tag it with #stuckindraft so we can find it and encourage you.

  3. Commit to finish that post! within a week.

  4. When you finish the completed version, update your StuckInDraft post to link to the completed posts.

  5. Tweet it again to let us know you've finished.
How easy is that? Sure, you run the risk of tipping off the world to your big idea when you post the short version, but how many times has someone scooped you while you kept it quiet? If you're thinking about it, there's a big chance that someone else is, too, so you might as well be able to take credit for the early post.

Now, you know where he is. Go! Confront the problem! Fight! Win! And call me when you get back, darling. I enjoy our visits.
—"Edna Mode," The Incredibles
Let's get those drafts unstuck!

Oh, yeah, my list.

  • Questions to ask before shopping for listening tools and services
    I've heard from social media analysis vendors that clients are issuing RFPs before knowing enough to ask the right questions. This is a list of questions that clients should ask themselves to discover their own requirements.

  • Opportunities in the intersections of analytics
    What value is hiding in the overlaps between social media analysis, web analytics, text analytics, business intelligence, customer relationship management...? What are the important connections in business processes and at a systems level?
Yup, I'm working on the easy posts that should write themselves. :-) What are you going to finish?

No, actually, this post didn't spend much time in the draft folder. Why do you ask?

About Nathan Gilliatt

Subscribe

  • Subscribe by email


Recent Comments

  • Nathan Gilliatt: Anne, I think the key takeaway is to step back read more
  • Larry Levy: Nathan, Thanks for including us on your list. Appinions is read more
  • tom.obrien@nmincite.com: Hi Nathan: Yes, Duncan Watts fairly demolishes most established "influencer" read more
  • Anne Weiskopf: Great article Nathan - thanks for the posting. It will read more
  • Nathan Gilliatt: Thanks, Lisa. I actually think Klout's interesting, but it's more read more
  • Lisa Thorell: Fab piece. What i like is, whether intentional or not, read more
  • Nathan Gilliatt: Thanks, Steve. I have to confess that Social Puff was read more
  • Steve Ardire: Hi Nathan - good post & along these lines you read more
  • Nathan Gilliatt: I should probably confirm these before I post that list, read more
  • Ken Burbary: Nathan - Curious, which 19 are gone? read more

New on SMA